Legal Opinion

Thurkettle v. Frost

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1904No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; Wolcott, J. Case by Henry Thurkettle against Shepherd P. Erost for malicious prosecution. There was 'judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

For many years a private ferry was maintained across Grand river. The first ferryman was one John Everhard, and in 1884 he obtained a license from the highway commissioner to build a habitation in the highway, at the river bank. Everhard sold his ferry and house to Rosegrant, and Rosegrant sold to Meyer, who gave back to Rosegrant a chattel mortgage upon the house and other property, including some outbuildings, boats, etc. Meyer sold to the plaintiff, no writings being given, and yielded possession to him in the year 1900. *117•He lived in the house from that time until the disagreement which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Brand v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  4. Israel v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Woodworth v. MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Murphy v. DavidsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Foster v. Chicago, Burlington Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Sappington v. FairfaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  5. Burch v. LockwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API