Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 2003No. 6 MAP 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
Ronald Lloyd, Sr. (Lloyd) appeals from an Order of the Commonwealth Court, which granted summary judgment in favor of the Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund). For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the determination of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 20, 1998, Robin Jackson-Lloyd (Robin), the wife of Lloyd, entered the Hahnemann Division of Allegheny University Hospital (AHERF) for a same-day elective procedure to remove a benign lesion from her right upper back. George Amrom, M.D. (Dr. Amrom)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Shambach v. BickhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- PECO Energy Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Paternaster v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.