Legal Opinion

Shroff v. Failla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendants in this negligence action. *1032Plaintiff submitted proof in evidentiary form establishing that her son was struck in the left eye with a .177 caliber pellet fired from a gun wielded by Craig Failla. That proof establishes plaintiff’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and defendants failed to raise an issue of fact in response thereto (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Radlin v. BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API