Legal Opinion
State v. Rahl
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Calhoun. Tried below before the Hon. Wesley Ogden. The indictment was against Pat Rahl and Esther Martin, on the charge that they “ unlawfully, indecently and scandalously did live together in fornication.” It was quashed on the motion of the defendants, based on the omission of the code to define the offense charged.
1Opinion of the CourtLindsay, J.
This case comes within the ruling of the court in the case of The State of Texas v. Foster, No. 3179, decided at the last Galveston term of this court, 1869. It is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RandleTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Ex parte BergenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1883
- Wolff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879