Legal Opinion

Amir Michael Karimi, et al. v. Behnam Rafalian, et al.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 24, 2026No. 2:22-cv-01379Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMIR MICHAEL KARIMI, ET AL, Case No.: 2:22-cv-01379-MWC-KS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF 14 LAW (TRIAL PHASE 3) BEHNAM RAFALIAN, ET AL, 15 Defendants 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (TRIAL PHASE 3) - 1 1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (TRIAL PHASE 3) 2 Plaintiffs Amir Michael Karimi and Trans Telecom Company, Inc. (collectively, 3 “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Behnam Rafalian and Soil Pacific Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) 4 5…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API