Legal Opinion

Arizona Cattle Co. v. Huber

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1893No. Civil No. 360PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Coconino. Edmund W. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Appellees, as the executors of the last will and testament of Otto Huber, deceased, brought suit in the district court of Coconino County against appellant company, upon a judgment obtained by them, as executors aforesaid against appellant, in the city court of the city of New York for the sum of $1,073.87. The complaint recited that said Otto Huber died in the city of New York on the thirty-first day of August, 1889, leaving a last will and testament wherein and whereby appellees were named as the executors thereof; that thereafter the s;:Id will was duly probated before the surrogate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Talmage v. ChapelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Alexander v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hare v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Phoenix Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API