Legal Opinion

D'Agostino v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 12, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Essex County Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate was employed by the defendant as a track laborer. On March 18th, 1902, he was working on the tracks of the company at Waverly. There are several paralleling tracks at this point. At the time he was killed the deceased was working upon track No. 5. The gang of which the deceased was a member was worldng on tracks Nos. 3, 4 and 5. Deceased was engaged in sorting loose stones from the earth on track No. 5,.which was the drill track, and throwing the stones, when sorted, on track No. 4, which is the westbound passenger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. Albanese v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Ondis' Administratrix v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Gudnestad v. Seaboard Coal Dock Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Precodnick v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API