Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Darryl M. Durr v. Betty Mitchell, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2007No. 00-3353Published

1Concurrence

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the majority’s opinion, but I write separately to address two concerns.

First, with regard to the rape conviction, I disagree with the Ohio Supreme Court’s view that the circumstantial evidence in this case was “highly probative” of rape. (Maj. Op. 449.) The court relied on (1) Durr’s unexplained statement that he was going to “waste” Angel because “she would tell,” and (2) that her body was nude from the waist down when discovered. This strikes me as somewhat probative; I have doubts whether any juror could properly infer from this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Jacobs v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Riley v. CockrellDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API