Legal Opinion

Claim of Mickens v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1129Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 31, 2004, which, inter alia, awarded workers’ compensation benefits, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed August 10, 2004, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration and/or full Board review.

Claimant suffered injuries in a work-related accident in 1993 and thereafter filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant received benefits at various rates over the next several years. In 2003, claimant and the employer entered into a stipulation agreement which, among other things, increased…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Dukes v. Capitol Formation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Claim of Pavone v. Ambassador Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Claim of Donhauser v. McLane NortheastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Lloyd v. New Era Cap Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Claim of Aska v. United Jewish AppealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Claim of Aska v. United Jewish AppealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API