Legal Opinion

Turck v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1964No. [App. No. 32, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, counsel for the applicant requested a transcript of proceedings, and one was ordered by this Court. The chief contention is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The transcript shows that Dr. Boslow, the only medical witness (although the applicant took the stand), in response to questions by Chief Judge Manley, testified that the applicant was not psychotic, not emotionally unbalanced, and not intellectually deficient, having an Í.Q. of 90. He nevertheless expressed the opinion that the applicant came…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Capparella v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API