Legal Opinion

Beaird v. City of Hokes Bluff

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. 2900483PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a zoning case.

Carl and Michael Beaird, (hereinafter referred to as Beaird), applied to the City of Hokes Bluff, Alabama (City), to have certain property they owned rezoned from R-1 (residential) to B-1 (business). Following the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council denied Beaird's request and refused to rezone the property. Thereafter, Beaird filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama, seeking an order against the City directing that the property be rezoned as B-1, and for damages for the City's failure to rezone the property upon proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Homewood v. CaffeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. City of Gadsden v. EntrekinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Watson v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Budget Inn of Daphne, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Reed v. City of HooverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Baldwin County Planning & Zoning Commission v. Montrose Ecor Rouge, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Harris v. Jefferson County Board of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. McKay v. StrawbridgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API