Legal Opinion

Stiner v. Antoni's Italian Café

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 21, 2003No. 2003-C-0209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIMER, Justice.

The limited issue before this court is whether use of the word “denial” in a statutorily mandated notice contained on a medical history questionnaire is sufficient to advise a potential employee that failure to truthfully answer the questions may result in forfeiture of any right to future workers’ compensation benefits. A writ of certiorari was granted to resolve a split in the circuits.

For reasons that follow, we conclude use of the word denial provides sufficient notice to an employee that untruthful answers on the medical history questionnaire may result in forfeiture of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. Wise v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Nabors Drilling USA v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nabors Drilling USA v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. State v. PetruzzelliSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API