Legal Opinion

Short v. Boss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

In closing his charge to the jury upon the special verdict of ten questions, with subdivisions, the court said: "After you have arrived at your own conclusions as to how the question should be answered, you will have your foreman write in the answer, and after you have completed your work you will return into court.” No reference was made in the charge to the present statutory provision, sec. 270.25, providing for a five-sixths verdict.

As returned, the verdict on its face would seemingly have warranted judgment for defendant on his counterclaim. Two of the jurors signed their names at the end…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. La Valley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Du Cate v. Town of BrightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hurst v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API