Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Shoemaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Denman, J.

Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Rush v Savchuk (444 US 320), which declared invalid the quasi in rem jurisdiction created under the doctrine of Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111), defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint or, alternatively, for leave to serve an amended answer pleading the affirmative defense of lack of jurisdiction. Special Term denied the motion but stated that it would grant a motion to dismiss if the parties would stipulate that plaintiff would institute *16an action in the appropriate jurisdiction, with recovery…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API