Legal Opinion
Hinderlider v. Everett
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 23, 1933No. 12,736Published
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
Our General Assembly in 1929 (S. L. 1929, p. 415), passed an act providing for the installation of self-registering devices for measuring the flow of water in the streams of the state and thereby amended previous statutes on the same subject enacted in 1921 and 1925. In section 1 of the 1929 Act it is provided that whenever, by reason of present or prospective litigation or adjustment respecting the diversion and use of the waters of any interstate stream, it may become advisable or necessary to make a comprehensive and detailed study and record of the flow of water in, or of diversions from,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sapero v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.