Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1991No. B14-90-029-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Appellant was charged by information with the offense of driving while intoxicated. After a plea of not guilty was entered, both sides proceeded to trial before a jury. The appellant was found guilty and punishment was assessed by the court at 180 days, probated for two years and a fine of $1000, a portion of which was also probated. Issues on appeal concern a claim of double jeopardy, sufficiency of the information and failure of the court to grant appellant’s motion to quash, admission of evidence claimed to be of appellant’s post-arrest silence, failure…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API