Legal Opinion

Savko v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 22, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

This is an action for negligence. The case was tried and submitted to the jury. The jury, after deliberation, returned to the court room, and, in answer to the court, the forelady stated that the jury had agreed upon a verdict, and the following colloquy took place: “The Court: In the case of Savko against Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation, have you agreed upon a verdict? Miss Fuchs: Yes; we find negligence on both parts. The Court: You find in favor of the defendant? Miss Fuchs: On both parts there is negligence. Counsel for Defendant: I move for entry of the verdict and I ask the jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Klepper v. Seymour House Corp. of Ogdensburg, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Jackson ex dem. Noah v. Dickenson & ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Porret v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Amore v. WilkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. De Vito v. KnettelLong Beach City Court · 1960
  3. De Vito v. KnettelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
  4. Manca v. Spencer, White & Prentis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API