Legal Opinion

Eagen v. Bolden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated *1018December 15, 1975, which directed him to pay a certain amount for the support of his wife and two children. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a further hearing as to the financial needs of appellant’s wife and children and for the entry of an appropriate order. There is no competent proof in the record on this appeal as to the financial needs of appellant’s wife and children (see…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rensselaer County Department of Social Services v. CossartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. People ex rel. Amendola v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Whitener v. WhitenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eason v. EasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Nowacki v. NowackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Carmen V. v. Bruce R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Staley v. StaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API