Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Haspel

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1934No. 28790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldred, District Judge.

Action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, Bertha Thomas, due to the alleged negligence of the defendant, Albert Haspel, in the operation of his automobile. There was a verdict for plaintiff for $3,000. Motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment entered on verdict. Defendant appeals.

Error is assigned in permitting appellee to amend her petition during trial to conform to the proof. The al*257legations of the petition, as originally filed, with reference to injuries, were: “That she sustained an incised wound over the left eye, several inches in length,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bainter v. AppelNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cotten v. StolleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. MoschelNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Miller Rubber Products Co. v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Struble v. Village of DeWittNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bonacci v. CerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Swan v. BowkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Porter v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Robinson Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Wendelin Baking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Schwarz v. FastCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API