Legal Opinion

Missimore v. Hauser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1930No. 28,645PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison,’J.:

This is an action for money had and received in which the trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, and to use the language of the appellant, “the only question involved in this appeal is whether or not the statute of limitations barred plaintiff’s claim under the facts and circumstances in evidence at the close of plaintiff’s case.”

*21The theory of the appellant throughout his well-prepared brief is that the appellant never knew the appellees had the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washbon v. Linscott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Ackerson v. National Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Guernsey v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Altman v. Phillips County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Leek v. Alliance Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API