In re Kimbler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
This petition for a writ of habeas corpus involves the constitutionality of the provisions exempting nonmanagerial employees without financial interest in their place of employment from criminal liability for exhibition of obscene matter (Pen. Code, § 311.2, *456subds. (c) and (d).)1 Petitioner contends that section 311.2, as applied, impermissibly discriminates against other nonmanagerial employees, such as bookstore clerks with no financial interest in the bookstore, who distribute such obscene matter, thereby denying them equal protection of the law. We disagree.
Secti…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985