Legal Opinion

Gates v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Conejos County Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Rising, C.

The plaintiff in error was prosecuted, before a justice of the peace in the town of Alamosa, for the violation of an ordinance of said town “concerning drays and other vehicles,” and upon trial was convicted and fined. Thereafter the defendant presented to said justice a bond for an appeal, which, in form and condition, was sufficient to effect an appeal to the county court from a judgment in a civil case. This bond was approved and filed by the justice within ten days from the rendition of judgment in said case; and the same, with papers in the case, and a transcript of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Marshall Silver Mining Co. v. KirtleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. De La Mar v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re FarrellMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Big Kanawha Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API