Faasch v. Karney
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This is a malpractice case. The defendant, Isabel Karney, was licensed and engaged in the practice of osteopathy, not osteopathy and surgery. She treated the plaintiff Mrs. Faasch professionally, and it was alleged in the complaint that the treatment was unskillful and negligent, causing serious injury for which a money judgment was sought. An answer was filed denying negligence and injury. Upon the trial to the court without a jury, findings and judgment were entered in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant has appealed.
The first assignment of error is the refusal of the court to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Lee Wing WahWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Powers v. Washington Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gray v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Richmond v. DennyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mostrom v. PettibonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Lucas v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Zarbell v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1947