Legal Opinion

Sharkey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEADBETTER, Judge.

Petitioner Rose Sharkey appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the allowance of subrogation rights to Shar-key’s American Hardware (employer) against petitioner’s third-party recovery in a medical malpractice action. The issue before this court is whether employer met its burden of proof by demonstrating through substantial evidence of record that it is entitled to subrogate against petitioner’s third-party recovery pursuant to Section 319 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 After review, we reverse.

In March 1988, while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Helms Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edder v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Gillette v. WurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Gillette v. WurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API