Winslow v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error, to the district court for Johnson county. Tried below before Broady, J. • cited: Vol. 1 Wharton Criminal Law, sec. 816; Bishop on Criminal Procedure, 139; Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, 105; State v. Williams, 41 Texas, 98; State v. Maxwell, 42 Iowa, 208. cited : Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, p. 105; Hall v. State, 48 Wis. 688; State v. Mann, 25 O. S. 668; 2 Bishop Criminal Procedure, sec. 698; Sallie v. State, 39 Alá. 691; Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, p. 376, note;…
Read the full summary
Error, to the district court for Johnson county. Tried below before Broady, J. • cited: Vol. 1 Wharton Criminal Law, sec. 816; Bishop on Criminal Procedure, 139; Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, 105; State v. Williams, 41 Texas, 98; State v. Maxwell, 42 Iowa, 208. cited : Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, p. 105; Hall v. State, 48 Wis. 688; State v. Mann, 25 O. S. 668; 2 Bishop Criminal Procedure, sec. 698; Sallie v. State, 39 Alá. 691; Maxwell’s Criminal Procedure, p. 376, note; People v. Lewis, 64 Cal. 401; 1 Wharton Criminal Law, sec. 813, 820.
1Opinion of the Court
Eeese, Ch. J.
Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of burglary.
He brings the cause into this court for review, by proceedings in error.
His principal objection is to the indictment which was returned by the grand jury, the charging part of which is that he “did on the fifth day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-seven, in the county of Johnson and state of Nebraska aforesaid, then and there feloniously and burglariously, in the night season, willfully, maliciously, and forcibly, break and enter into a store house occupied by one Eobert M. Frost,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sedlacek v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Schultz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. La CroixSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.