Legal Opinion

Bowne v. Bilsland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 1, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from O’Brien District Cotwt. — Hon. C. H. Lewis, Judge. Action to recover for trespass by the defendants' in wrongfully entering upon lands owned by the plaintiffs, and cultivating the same. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

I. Defendants deny the allegations of the plaintiffs’ petition, and allege that they entered upon and held possession of the land under a homestead settlement, with the intent to acquire the lands under the homestead laws of the United States, and made application to the proper United States land officers to enter the land as homesteads; that the land officers refused to permit the entry, though, as the defendants allege, the land was subject to the homestead entry; that thereupon the defendants appealed from the decision; and the appeal has not been determined, but is pending before the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sioux City & St. Paul Railroad v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGregor & M. R. R. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Sioux City & St. Paul R. v. County of OsceolaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Goodrich v. BeamanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Iowa Falls & Sioux City Ry. Co. v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co. v. HemenwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Ayres v. KalstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API