Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beahan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1515 C.D. 1982Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Babbieri :

Most respectfully, I must dissent. The referee’s finding that Claimant’s injury was suffered “in the course of, and was related to, his employment” is supported by evidence which the referee as the trier of fact could rightfully accept. In accepting the Board’s reversal based upon its contrary findings, the majority states: “ [t]he Board found that the Claimant *545chose to take the discs home for personal reasons, and did so for his own convenience rather than that of the Employer.”

Since, in my view, whether Claimant’s acts were for personal reasons or for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Artrip v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Forschner v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API