Legal Opinion

Ayersman v. Iowa Department of Job Service

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1988No. 86-1771PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The controlling question is whether substantial evidence supports an agency finding that there was misconduct on the part of the employee-claimant which justified his being fired. On judicial review of agency action the district eourt affirmed a denial of unemployment benefits. We agree.

Donald Ayersman was employed as a dispatcher for Heritage Communications, Inc. He is diabetic and claims to be an alcoholic. After previously being warned about drinking on the job he was seen going to his car during working hours, reaching under the seat, pulling a bottle in a sack out, and drinking from it.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huntoon v. Iowa Department of Job ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Meads v. Iowa Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Maschino v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Contract Services, Ltd. v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Breithaupt v. Employment Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API