Legal Opinion

Hotsradt v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1910No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ejectment by Caroline L. Hoysradt and others against the Delaware, Rackawanna & Western Railroad and another. On plaintiff’s appeal from taxation of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The plaintiffs recovered a verdict in this case, on which, by direction of the court, judgment was entered (151 Fed. 321); but, on error to the Court of Appeals, this was reversed and judgment given for the defendant (159 Fed. 383, 86 C. C. A. 383); and on application to the Supreme Court a certiorari was denied (209 U. S. 551, 28 Sup. Ct. 761, 52 L. Ed. 922); upon which the mandate from- the Court of Appeals was sent down and filed here June 24, 1910. The case having thus been finally disposed of on the *882merits, the clerk of this court was called on by the defendants…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harger v. Commissioners of Washington CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  2. Cavender v. CavenderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
  3. Bean v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. McIlwaine v. EllingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1900
  5. Steever v. RickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Solomon v. A. W. Farney, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In re Visking Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. State v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Williamson v. Electric Service Supplies Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API