Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. David " Mould, Judge. Suit to reform and cancel supersedeas bond, resulting in a decree as prayed. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

An action for separate maintenance was prosecuted by defendant against her husband, Wm. O. Russell, resulting in a decree requiring him to pay for her support $80 on the 18th day of each month. The defendant therein perfected an appeal and applied to the district court to fix the amount of the supersedeas bond, and the court, Hon. John F. Oliver presiding, ordered: “That the *675amount of the supersedeas bond herein be, and the same is fixed at, $1,500; the filing of a -supersedeas bond herein in the sum of $1,500, with sureties to be approved by the clerk of this court.; that all the proceedings…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nourse v. WeitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pohlenz v. PankoNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API