Legal Opinion

United States v. Wayne A. Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1993No. 92-4232PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*792DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

A member of the court having requested that the mandate for the original panel opinion, dated December 29, 1992, be withheld, the court now on its own motion withdraws such opinion and substitutes this opinion in lieu thereof.

In this ease we decide whether the district court’s failure to inform the defendant when he entered his guilty plea that the maximum sentence he could receive would include an additional mandatory sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3147 violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that under our recent en banc decision in United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. United States v. DadiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Craig Michael Coscarelli, Also Known as John CoscarelliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. BozzaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API