Legal Opinion

State v. Branam

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1982No. CR 81-93PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an appeal by the State questioning the trial court’s suppression of a statement made by James T. Branam. While the facts are somewhat complex, the question is not. It is simply a matter of whether Branam had waived his right to have counsel when he talked to the police. The trial court ruled that the State had not met its burden of proof in this regard and we cannot say the court was clearly wrong. The decision is affirmed.

Branam was charged with the capital murder of Phillip Hammett on December 30, 1980. He was arraigned in municipal court the next day and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Coble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Radovsky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Gilbreath V. Union BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API