Legal Opinion

Dommes v. Zuroski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1944No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

' Plaintiffs, a father and his minor son, have judgments on verdicts in their suit to recover for injuries sustained by the minor who was shot by the defendant. The father has judgment for $395, 1 the minor for $4,000. This was the third trial. After the first trial, with verdicts for plaintiffs, a new trial was granted. In the second trial, the jury disagreed.

Defendant took only one appeal, which, we assume 2 from the brief, was from the judgment for the minor.

The assignments of error, as summarized in the statement of questions involved, complain that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. VanderpoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Nikitka's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Rooney v. MacZkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Brown v. SchockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. Steel v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Pratt v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Schwegel v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Peters v. ShearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API