Legal Opinion

City of Sand Springs v. Hohl

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1923No. 13878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Suit was filed by defendants in error in the district court of Tulsa county to enjoin plaintiffs in error from enforcing special assessments against the property in certain improvement districts in the city of Sand Springs, and also to enjoin t he issuing and selling- of paving script. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.

Upon the trial of the case in the district court, the special assessments were declared void and the injunctive relief requested by plaintiffs was granted, from which judgment defendants have prosecuted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. City of Springfield ex rel. Central National Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Anselmi v. City of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Joseph Rugo, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Perkins v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Driver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API