Legal Opinion

Napleton v. Ray Buick, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1998No. 1-98-0747PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiff Edward F. Napleton sought a declaratory judgment establishing his rights regarding an option to purchase certain real estate that he leased from defendant Ray Buick, Inc. The circuit court granted summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor, determining that plaintiff properly exercised the option and that the lease and any unexercised options to extend the lease must be considered in applying the formula to establish the purchase price of the real estate. Defendant now appeals.

For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On November 26, 1996, plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Daniels v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Midland Management Co. v. HelgasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. M X L Industries, Inc. v. MulderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. T and N Master Builder and RevovatorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Nationwide Mut. Fire v. T&N Master BuilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Balmoral Racing Club, Inc. v. Churchill Downs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Jimmy Kyle v. J.A. Fulmer TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API