Legal Opinion
The Driving Force, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-3675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Both plaintiff and defendant in this trademark action 1 seek injunctive relief granting exclusive use of the name “The Driving Force,” as well as damages. Each provides essentially the same services, the supplying of truck drivers and the leasing of transport personnel to companies to drive trucks and perform associated services. Each operates in Pennsylvania and surrounding states, as well as in many other states in the country. By memorandum opinion and order of August 15, 1980, this court stayed its proceedings pending a decision by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Blue Bell, Inc. v. Farah Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Louis Rich, Inc. v. Horace W. Longacre, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. F. & P. S.P.A.District Court, E.D. California · 1994
- C-Cure Chemical Co., Inc. v. Secure Adhesives Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Gaibis v. Werner Continental, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- American Bakeries Co. v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Melton Properties, LLC v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022