Commonwealth v. Hare
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 179, Oct. T., 1907, by defendant, from order of C. P. Blair Co., June T., 1907, No. 108, discharging relator, in case of Commonwealth ex rel. Buell N. Burlingame v. A-. L: Hare, sheriff. Writ of habeas corpus. Before Bell, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior-Court. Error assigned was order discharging the relator.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hendeeson, J.,
Much of the discussion to which our attention is directed in the paper-books of the appellant and appellee is beyond the limits of our legitimate inquiry. The appeal is in effect a certiorari, in which our jurisdiction is 1 estríe ted to an exami*?nation of the record. The evidence introduced and the rulings . of the judge thereon are not properly before us: Com. v. McDougall, 203 Pa. 291; Com. ex rel. v. Strickland, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 309; Thatcher’s Requisition, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 533. Turning to the record we find that the petition of the relator sets forth the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Munsey v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sands v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spivak v. HeinzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Katz v. Philadelphia Prison SuperintendentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smalley v. AytchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hunt v. GromanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.