Cook v. Martin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Garland Chancery Court. LEEAND Leattierman, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. John J. Sumpter was in 1895 the owner of a one-third interest in lots 4 and 5 of block 112, of the city of Hot Springs, Garland County. On the 26th of June, 1895, one William Cameron recovered a judgment agdinst Sumpter. On December 5, 1895, execution was issued on this judgment. On January 14, 1896, Sumpter gave a stay bond, staying this execution for six months.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Garland Chancery Court. LEEAND Leattierman, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. John J. Sumpter was in 1895 the owner of a one-third interest in lots 4 and 5 of block 112, of the city of Hot Springs, Garland County. On the 26th of June, 1895, one William Cameron recovered a judgment agdinst Sumpter. On December 5, 1895, execution was issued on this judgment. On January 14, 1896, Sumpter gave a stay bond, staying this execution for six months. In July, 1896, Sumpter executed a deed conveying his interest in the lots to his mother, but the deed was dated as if executed on the 6th day of…
1Opinion of the Court
Riddick, J.,
(after stating the facts.) This is a contest over the title of one-third interest in two lots in the city of Hot Springs, formerly owned by John J. Sumpter. It is admitted that Cameron, under whom Mrs. Martin, the intervener, holds, obtained a judgment against Sumpter which was a lien on the lots before the attachment of plaintiffs was either issued or levied. But it is said that Sumpter afterwards made a fraudulent conveyance of this property, and that after this conveyance was made he executed a stay bond, staying the Cameron judgment, and that the lien of the judgment was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert v. HewetsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Herrick v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Donahue v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Shadewald v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Thompson v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Mortgage Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Adams v. SpillyardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Reeder v. MeredithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Stuckey v. LockardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Tyler Refrigeration Equipment Co. v. StonickOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.