Cummings v. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Equity. Bill by Arthur E. Cummings and others against the Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum and others.
1Opinion of the Court
HALE, District Judge.
The bill alleges that the plaintiffs, Arthur F. Cummings and James E. Upstone, are citizens of New Hampshire, and are acting on behalf of themselves and all others of a like class and similarly situated, contributors to trust funds, thereinafter described, and held by the defendant; that the defendant is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Massachusetts, and a citizen of'that state; that the plaintiffs are owners of an interest in trust funds of approximately $3,500,000 held in trust by the defendant. It is alleged, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Dill v. Supreme LodgeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1915
- Huntington v. SaundersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grand Lodge, K. P. v. ShorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- McGarry v. LentzDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1925
- McGarry v. LentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Woodmen of the World v. McCueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.