Franklin v. Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $5000. Tlie court sustained defendant’s motion for a new trial “because of improper argument on the part of plaintiff’s attorney.” Plaintiff lias appealed. The argument causing the granting of the new trial is as follows:
“Now, gentlemen, if you do find for him (plaintiff) he is a young boy with a young wife and young baby..
Mr. Lee : (interrupting) Just a moment. I ask that counsel be reprimanded for that remark — just a minute —first, because there isn’t any proof of it, and, second,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Dayharsh v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Mahaney v. St. Louis & Hannibal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Pope v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heibel v. RobisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Holtz v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Halley Ex Rel. Halley v. SchoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935