In re Coderre
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The respondent, Paul A. Coderre, appeals from the final divorce decree recommended by a Master (Harriet J. Fishman, Esq.) and approved by the Brentwood Family Division (Taube, J.). He argues that the court erred by: 1) ordering him to pay for his children’s uninsured medical expenses and extracurricular activity expenses in addition to child support under the child support guidelines; 2) failing to adjust his child support obligation downward to account for those expenses; and 3) increasing his support obligation as a substitute for alimony. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The record…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Nault v. N & L Development Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Appeal of BradySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Wheaton-Dunberger v. DunbergerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re PeirceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In re PlaistedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In re BarrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.