Legal Opinion

In re Coderre

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 2002No. 2001-288PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The respondent, Paul A. Coderre, appeals from the final divorce decree recommended by a Master (Harriet J. Fishman, Esq.) and approved by the Brentwood Family Division (Taube, J.). He argues that the court erred by: 1) ordering him to pay for his children’s uninsured medical expenses and extracurricular activity expenses in addition to child support under the child support guidelines; 2) failing to adjust his child support obligation downward to account for those expenses; and 3) increasing his support obligation as a substitute for alimony. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The record…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Nault v. N & L Development Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Appeal of BradySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. Wheaton-Dunberger v. DunbergerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. In re PeirceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. In re PlaistedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. In re BarrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API