William Z. Faulkenberry, Cross v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co., Cross
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s judgment for the plaintiff-railroad engineer, who allegedly suffered a heart attack as a result of a train derailment in the defendant’s Baton Rouge yard. The action was brought under the provisions of the FELA, 45 U.S.C. § 51. Both parties appealed and after careful consideration of the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel, we affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects.
The defendant-railroad urges on appeal that there was insufficient proof of negligent track maintenance on its part and that the court’s instruction to the jury…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raymond D. Robert v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- James Lindsey, Cross-Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Morgan v. Monessen Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Garcia v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Carver v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.