Legal Opinion
Artwohl v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 11, 1970No. 151-66PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs herein claim just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for an alleged taking of their property by the United States. The property allegedly taken is the “excess profits” from the duty-free sale of private automobiles in Brazil by the plaintiffs pursuant to a diplomatic privilege. The commissioner found for the plaintiffs. We reverse.*
Plaintiffs are members of the U.S. Armed Forces who at the time of the transactions here involved were assigned to the Joint Brazil-United States Military Commission, (JBUSMC) in Bio de Janeiro,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Dominic Eyherabide, Jean M. Eyherabide, Raymond Castanchoa and Marie Castanchoa v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arnold A. Morse, Sr., and Hellen v. Morse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Herman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Lcc-Mzt Team IV v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021