Legal Opinion
Trad v. Hodes
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 30, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 N.J. Super. 306 (1962)
178 A.2d 247
GEORGE TRAD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT D. HODES AND LENA HORNE BEAUTY PRODUCTS, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Argued January 12, 1962.
Decided January 30, 1962.
Mr. Harold H. Fisher argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys).
Mr. Irving L. Hodes argued the cause for defendants (Messrs. Hodes & Hodes, attorneys).
MATTHEWS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writ (mandamus) in which plaintiff, who is a stockholder in defendant corporation, seeks judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. BeeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Soltz v. Exhibitors' Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- People ex rel. Rottenberg v. Utah Gold & Copper Mines Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- State v. People's Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Travel Agts. Malpractice v. Regal Cul. Soc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Welland Inv. Corp. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF JERSEYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963