Legal Opinion

Alaska Pacific Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Copper River & N. E. Ry. Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided June 11, 1907No. 623APublished

1Opinion of the CourtWickersham, District Judge

(orally). Thife is an application for an injunction on the part of the Alaska Pacific Railway & Terminal Company to restrain the Copper-River & Northwestern Railway Company, the Katalla! Company, and M. K. Rogers, the superintendent of the | defendant companies from entering upon plaintiff’s terminal grounds, opposite Martin Island, near Katalla, and building defendants’ railroad across the same, and from crossing! plaintiff’s tracks now built thereon. ,

The plaintiff company shows that it has located terminal grounds on the seashore for its road, and has built á grade on bridging across the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Washington & Idaho Railroad v. Cœur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Steele v. Tanana Mines R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  4. McFarland v. Alaska Perseverance Mining Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1907
  5. Steele v. Tanana Mines Ry. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API