Legal Opinion
In re Barber
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The petitioner is brought before me upon a writ of habeas corpus. He alleges in his petition that he is restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Ramsey county under a warrant cf commitment issued by a justice of the peace, being found guilty of violating the following act of the legislature of the state of Minnesota, approved April 16, 1889, entitled “An act for the protection of the public health by providing for the inspection, before slaughter, of cattle, sheep, and swine designed for slaughter for human food.” “Be it enacted,” etc.:
*■ “Section 1. The sale of any fresh beef, veal,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Territory v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Appleton v. EcaubertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1894
- City of El Paso v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931