Legal Opinion

State v. Radford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1925No. 19322. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mackintosh, J.-

— This is an appeal from a conviction upon an information, the charging part of which is as follows:

“He, said Jack Radford, in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 20th day of November, A. D. 1924, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously did have in his possession a certain -narcotic drug, to-wit, 4 bindles of morphine, 1.8 grains per bindle or a total of 7.2 grains, which narcotic drug had been theretofore unlawfully acquired by him, said Jack Radford.”

The objection raised to the conviction is that the information does not charge a crime.

Section 3 et seq. of ch. 47,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HelmerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API