Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 9, 2012No. 10-2213PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs William B. Elliott, Tommy J. Evaro, and Andria J. Hernandez were all targets of investigations by the Doña Ana County grand jury. Under New Mexico law they were entitled to target notices that advised them of the right to testify before the grand jury. But the notices they received may not have complied with state law. They filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, alleging that District Attorney Susana Martinez violated their due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Moya v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Jeffery Wansley v. MS Department of Corrections, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Elwell v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.