Legal Opinion
Dankner v. Szurzan & Dorf, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for payment on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated November 29, 1994, which denied her motion to renew her previous motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff brought this action by a summons and a motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint based on the default in payment of a promissory note. Summary judgment was denied as against the individual defendants because the plaintiff failed to prove that they had personally guaranteed the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Martinez v. Hudson Armored Car & Courier, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Silverman v. Leucadia Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Elgem, Inc. v. National Gypsum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Natale v. Jeffrey Samel & AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Tri-State Consumer Insurance v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Drasner v. DrasnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Quigley v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ramos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009