Legal Opinion

Ticehurst v. Beinbrink

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiff has recovered a judgment against the defendant, who is an innkeeper, for the value of a horse which was stolen while in the defendant’s stable. The plaintiff, a veterinary surgeon, intending to drive his horse from Oyster Bay, L. L., to New York city, decided, when he reached Hollis, L. I., not to go any farther with his horse at that time. He stopped at the hotel or inn of the defendant. He tied his horse under a shed and went into the inn and asked the person whom he found in charge if he could leave his horse at the inn stable during the night, ás he intended to return to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McDaniels v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  2. Clute v. WigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  3. Ingalsbee v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Cromwell v. StephensNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1867
  5. Crapo v. RockwellNew York Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GundersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Salisbury v. St. Regis-Sheraton Hotel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API